Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

According to documentation:

The shape primitives are drawn in the color specified in the preceding -fill option. For unfilled shapes, use -fill none. You can optionally control the stroke with the -stroke and -strokewidth options.
(see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322538)

If I type
convert -size 10x10 -fill red -stroke blue -draw "point 5,5" xc:white /tmp/output.xpm

the pixel is red ! Please document that point use fill or correct to use stroke

Regards

Bastien

broucaries wrote:According to documentation:

The shape primitives are drawn in the color specified in the preceding -fill option. For unfilled shapes, use -fill none. You can optionally control the stroke with the -stroke and -strokewidth options.
(see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322538)

If I type
convert -size 10x10 -fill red -stroke blue -draw "point 5,5" xc:white /tmp/output.xpm

the pixel is red ! Please document that point use fill or correct to use stroke

Regards

Bastien

Try using the IM v6 syntax.

convert input argument output

convert -size 10x10 xc:white -fill red -draw "point 5,5" /tmp/output.xpm

see
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/basics/#cmdline

also I don't believe that points have strokes

fmw42 wrote:

broucaries wrote:According to documentation:

The shape primitives are drawn in the color specified in the preceding -fill option. For unfilled shapes, use -fill none. You can optionally control the stroke with the -stroke and -strokewidth options.
(see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322538)

If I type
convert -size 10x10 -fill red -stroke blue -draw "point 5,5" xc:white /tmp/output.xpm

the pixel is red ! Please document that point use fill or correct to use stroke

Regards

Bastien

Try using the IM v6 syntax.

convert input argument output

convert -size 10x10 xc:white -fill red -draw "point 5,5" /tmp/output.xpm

see
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/basics/#cmdline

Ok I do and it does not change

also I don't believe that points have strokes

Not sure in postscript point are drawn using degenerate path, and therefore are stroked. I suppose we should document that point are not stroked.

Regards

Bastien

Hi,

That is the official imagemagick position about this. should I submit a documentation patch?

Regards

At this time points are draw only using the fill color. Typically the stroke color is set to 'none' to turn it off.

However points are also not 'drawn' but are color replaced. They are NOT a normal Vector Graphic Language method, but a much lower level primative. As such stoke would not apply in any case.

I documented my finding about point in IM examples, and how it differs from the other color primatives.
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/draw/#color

If you want to properly 'draw' points you should also look at the points size and diameter, which means you really are drawing small circles, and not pixels!

See IM Examples on various techniques for circle and symbol drawing.
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/draw/#circles

I rather like the use of stroking a near zero-length line with round endcaps for this type of thing.

So it is a feature.

Your documentation is really nice indeed

Patch the doc documenting the feature

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor ... bug=322537

Regards

Fixed